Do you agree or disagree with his position?
This was included in his latest warrant canary statement:
> Please stop trying to censor the Internet. You are begging for a future where all online communication in the United States is regulated by a handful of megacorporations with all meaningful decisions taking place behind closed doors and having no appeals process.
> "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Benjamin Franklin
> We will lose everything if we continue down this path. Our world is scary, and with machine learning we are fast approaching an environment where all online consumption is expediently monitored and judged by unthinking, unfeeling machines designed for the sole purpose of generating assholes like Jeff Bezos an unfathomable amount of money.
> If you believe that shutting down legal websites allowing people to say what they want is a way to safeguard against new censorship ("sites like this are why we can't have nice things"), you are falling prey to a contradictory logic where the only way to avoid censorship is to impose censorship on self.
> If you're not being censored because you don't say censored things, then is a problem? Yes! This is how people behaved in East Germany and under Stalin. People were even afraid to think bad thoughts, on the off chance that those thoughts might manifest into criminal speech.
> The Supreme Court will likely uphold the first amendment for decades to come, consolidate power in private industries that work nice with the government (look at how all these same companies have ongoing government contracts). In doing so, they can restrict or promote certain information to influence people and make regulatory changes which enforce their power more likely to happen.
 - https://git.kiwifarms.net/Null/Transparency/src/branch/master/2021/07/2021-07-01.txt.asc